Product demo

    Agentic Product Audit

    Your tickets may be complete. Your tests may be green. Your release may still contain gaps nobody has connected. Pandysoft Agentic Product Audit independently analyses requirements, implementation and testing across an entire product or release.

    A worked fictional demonstration on an invented payments product. No customer repository is analysed, and every figure below is prepared demonstration data.

    Talk to Pandysoft

    Release analysed

    Payments Platform · Release 24.8

    Requirements
    34stories
    Acceptance criteria
    127analysed
    Automated tests
    418analysed
    Repositories
    2analysed
    Codebase
    81,420lines
    Services
    7in scope

    Fictional demonstration data used to illustrate the analysis workflow.

    What this demonstrates

    The quality gate looks at a single change. An audit looks at a whole product or release, and asks whether the things that were built add up to the thing that was specified.

    Tickets closing is not the same as a product being correct

    Every ticket in a release can be complete, reviewed and merged, and the release can still be missing behaviour. Requirements do not decompose cleanly into tickets, and what falls between two tickets belongs to neither. Nothing in a ticket-based workflow is responsible for noticing that.

    What an audit covers

    Requirements are mapped to implementation and to tests across the release rather than one change at a time. That surfaces coverage which looks complete per ticket but has holes at the level of the product: a criterion split across two changes and only half delivered, a rule enforced on one path and not another, a requirement whose failure path was never specified so was never tested.

    Why it is done independently

    The value comes from the audit not sharing the assumptions that produced the code. A review carried out by the same agents, or against the same interpretation of the requirement, inherits the misreading it is supposed to find.

    Common questions

    How is this different from the quality gate?
    Scope and timing. The gate runs on a single change before it is merged. The audit runs across a release or a whole product, usually ahead of a go-live decision.
    What do you need from us to run one?
    The requirements in whatever form they exist, the repository, and the test suite. Requirements that live only in people's heads are the common blocker, and discovering that is itself a result worth having.
    Does a confidence score mean the product is safe to ship?
    No. It summarises how much of the specified behaviour could be evidenced, and it is not a prediction. The ranked risks are the part that should drive the decision, not the number.